Mar 31
links for 2006-03-31
icon1 Niklas | icon2 Tags: . | icon4 03 31st, 2006| icon3No Comments »
Mar 30
links for 2006-03-30
icon1 Niklas | icon2 Tags: . | icon4 03 30th, 2006| icon3No Comments »
Mar 29
links for 2006-03-29
icon1 Niklas | icon2 Tags: . | icon4 03 29th, 2006| icon3No Comments »
Mar 28
links for 2006-03-28
icon1 Niklas | icon2 Tags: . | icon4 03 28th, 2006| icon3No Comments »
Mar 28
It’s enterprisey!
icon1 Niklas | icon2 Tags: , . | icon4 03 28th, 2006| icon3No Comments »

The new favorite word makes it to wikipedia. [via Mark]

Mar 27
Networked GTA?
icon1 Niklas | icon2 Tags: . | icon4 03 27th, 2006| icon3No Comments »

Rumour has it that a future Grand Theft Auto might be in the form of a multiplayer game. Just yesterday I finished all the main missions of GTA3 San Andreas (some 77% completion over all). Networked or not, I can’t wait to get my hands on the next sequel. GTA3 SA was by far the best game I’ve ever played. And with 100+ main missions, 100+ races and tons of other optional missions, it’s hard to get more bang for the bucks.

Now, on to Shadow of the Colossus.

Mar 27
It’s enterprisey!
icon1 Niklas | icon2 Tags: , . | icon4 03 27th, 2006| icon3No Comments »

The new favorite word makes it to wikipedia. [via Mark]

Mar 27
links for 2006-03-27
icon1 Niklas | icon2 Tags: . | icon4 03 27th, 2006| icon3No Comments »
Mar 25
links for 2006-03-25
icon1 Niklas | icon2 Tags: . | icon4 03 25th, 2006| icon3No Comments »
Mar 23
SOA == WS?
icon1 Niklas | icon2 Tags: . | icon4 03 23rd, 2006| icon31 Comment »

My colleague Mårten just replied to Jimmy Nilssons question regarding whether SOA == WS. As Mårten, I think that equation is not necessarily true, possibly not even desirable.

I view services as a well designed (from both a business and technical standpoint) interface to perform a function. This is not bound to a particular technology (such as WS-*).  In fact, I think the whole WS-* mess in many cases is holding back the possibilities of building a working SOA due to its complexity. I’m certainly a part of the Loyal WS-Opposition and prefer to use the strengths of each protocol rather than adding a leaky layer on top. In my world, using HTTP (preferably REST like) and a MOM (like ActiveMQ or WebSphere MQ) will suffice for building a very strong and flexible backbone to enable SOA.

But, the hard part of building a SOA is not the technical details (that’s been solved for years), it’s finding a appropriate services based on the business requirements. The experience in this area is far less advanced.

« Previous Entries